Log Line:

Log Line:

Log Line:

Sharp Objects, Euphoria, and The Night Of, converge in an immersive crime drama where the audience becomes the Jury.


As the case unfolds across episodes and platforms, viewers receive evidence, debate theories, and ultimately vote to decide the verdict that determines how the story ends.

The Concept

The Concept

The Concept

The Jury transforms television into story that spills beyond the screen.

A drama that lives in our social feeds, our group chats and our water-cooler conversations - blurring where the story ends and real life begins.


It’s as binge-worthy as the most gripping thriller - but for those who choose to join the Jury, the story deepens into something unprecedented: a living, breathing investigation that rewards curiosity and presents rabbit hole after rabbit hole to dive down.

Every episode invites audiences deeper into the case. They’re given evidence to review, conversations to join, and ultimately, a verdict to render.

It’s more than a story about justice - it’s a reminder that the screen is no longer the edge of the story.

The Experience

Each episode of The Jury ends with more than a cliffhanger.

As the episode comes to a close, viewers receive an on-screen invitation - a way to step inside the story. The Judge addresses the Jury, a QR code appears, and viewers are drawn further into the trial.

By scanning the episode’s QR code every Juror gains access to an evidence pack: fragments from the case that feel too detailed to be fiction.

Photographs. Messages. Security footage. Handwritten notes. Audio pulled from the courtroom floor.

Online, the audience begins to behave like investigators - dissecting evidence, debating timelines, and exposing contradictions across Reddit threads, TikTok breakdowns, and dedicated social feeds.

The case doesn’t just unfold on screen - it lives and evolves in real time, fueled by the Jury’s discoveries.

As the trial builds toward its final episode, the tone shifts.
The final QR code is a simple but difficult single decision: innocent or guilty.
The Jury - millions of viewers around the world, cast their votes.
The outcome determines the ending that will air.

The story becomes a cultural event and no one experiences it in exactly the same way.

The Experience

Each episode of The Jury ends with more than a cliffhanger.

At the episode comes to a close, viewers receive an on-screen invitation - a way to step inside the story. The Judge addresses the Jury, a QR code appears, and viewers are drawn further into the trial.

By scanning the episode’s QR code every Juror gains access to an evidence pack: fragments from the case that feel too detailed to be fiction.

Photographs. Messages. Security footage. Handwritten notes. Audio pulled from the courtroom floor.

Online, the audience begins to behave like investigators - dissecting evidence, debating timelines, and exposing contradictions across Reddit threads, TikTok breakdowns, and dedicated social feeds.

The case doesn’t just unfold on screen - it lives and evolves in real time, fueled by the Jury’s discoveries.

As the trial builds toward its final episode, the tone shifts.
The final QR code is a simple but difficult single decision: innocent or guilty.
The Jury - millions of viewers around the world - cast their votes.
The outcome determines the ending that will air.

The story becomes a cultural event - and no one experiences it in exactly the same way.



The Experience

Each episode of The Jury ends with more than a cliffhanger.

As the episode comes to a close, viewers receive an on-screen invitation - a way to step inside the story. The Judge addresses the Jury, a QR code appears, and viewers are drawn further into the trial.

By scanning the episode’s QR code every Juror gains access to an evidence pack: fragments from the case that feel too detailed to be fiction.

Photographs. Messages. Security footage. Handwritten notes. Audio pulled from the courtroom floor.

Online, the audience begins to behave like investigators - dissecting evidence, debating timelines, and exposing contradictions across Reddit threads, TikTok breakdowns, and dedicated social feeds.

The case doesn’t just unfold on screen - it lives and evolves in real time, fueled by the Jury’s discoveries.

As the trial builds toward its final episode, the tone shifts.
The final QR code is a simple but difficult single decision: innocent or guilty.
The Jury - millions of viewers around the world, cast their votes.
The outcome determines the ending that will air.

The story becomes a cultural event and no one experiences it in exactly the same way.

Jury Member QR Code

As every episode ends a new obsession begins.

The Case - Season One

It starts at Brown University.
A party at the infamous lacrosse house. Music. Lights. Too many drinks.

By morning, one of the players is dead - bludgeoned, found in a teammate’s bed.

Within forty-eight hours, the team’s head coach - Capelle, a decorated Ivy League legend, mother of two is charged with murder.

The news spreads fast.
Before the arraignment ends, the court of public opinion has already convened.

The prosecution builds a clean narrative: opportunity, motive, a temper sharpened by pressure.
The defense counters with silence. Doubt. The space between what happened and what can be proved.

Inside the courtroom, the story plays out with restraint and ritual.
Outside, it unravels.
Students close ranks. Lovers turn on each other. Faculty whisper about scandal. Alumni demand answers. The university scrubs its image.

Rumours of jealousy, betrayal, and desire begin to surface - emotions tangled with ambition and revenge.

As the trial moves forward, fragments emerge:
a voicemail left too late, a security camera that caught almost everything, a diary entry that reads like confession.

Each episode peels back another layer - not only of the case, but of the people drawn into it.

Every character becomes a suspect. Every truth becomes negotiable.

By the time the jury is called to deliberate, the audience will know what it feels like to hold a life in their hands and to not be sure what they believe.

The Case - Season One

It starts at Brown University.
A party at the infamous lacrosse house. Music. Lights. Too many drinks.

By morning, one of the players is dead - bludgeoned, found in a teammate’s bed.

Within forty-eight hours, the team’s head coach - Capelle, a decorated Ivy League legend, mother of two is charged with murder.

The news spreads fast.
Before the arraignment ends, the court of public opinion has already convened.

The prosecution builds a clean narrative: opportunity, motive, a temper sharpened by pressure.
The defense counters with silence. Doubt. The space between what happened and what can be proved.

Inside the courtroom, the story plays out with restraint and ritual.
Outside, it unravels.
Students close ranks. Lovers turn on each other. Faculty whisper about scandal. Alumni demand answers. The university scrubs its image.

Rumours of jealousy, betrayal, and desire begin to surface - emotions tangled with ambition and revenge.

As the trial moves forward, fragments emerge:
a voicemail left too late, a security camera that caught almost everything, a diary entry that reads like confession.

Each episode peels back another layer - not only of the case, but of the people drawn into it.

Every character becomes a suspect. Every truth becomes negotiable.

By the time the jury is called to deliberate, the audience will know what it feels like to hold a life in their hands and to not be sure what they believe.

The Case - Season One

It starts at Brown University.
A party at the infamous lacrosse house. Music. Lights. Too many drinks.

By morning, one of the players is dead - bludgeoned, found in a teammate’s bed.

Within forty-eight hours, the team’s head coach - Capelle, a decorated Ivy League legend, mother of two is charged with murder.

The news spreads fast.
Before the arraignment ends, the court of public opinion has already convened.

The prosecution builds a clean narrative: opportunity, motive, a temper sharpened by pressure.
The defense counters with silence. Doubt. The space between what happened and what can be proved.

Inside the courtroom, the story plays out with restraint and ritual.
Outside, it unravels.
Students close ranks. Lovers turn on each other. Faculty whisper about scandal. Alumni demand answers. The university scrubs its image.

Rumours of jealousy, betrayal, and desire begin to surface - emotions tangled with ambition and revenge.

As the trial moves forward, fragments emerge:
a voicemail left too late, a security camera that caught almost everything, a diary entry that reads like confession.

Each episode peels back another layer - not only of the case, but of the people drawn into it.

Every character becomes a suspect. Every truth becomes negotiable.

By the time the jury is called to deliberate, the audience will know what it feels like to hold a life in their hands and to not be sure what they believe.

The Verdict

The Verdict

The Verdict

All season long, every clue and contradiction leads toward one final moment - a decision that rests in the hands of the audience.


When the final episode approaches, The Jury - millions of viewers - cast their verdict: guilty or innocent.

Their votes decide which ending airs.

The finale isn’t just the end of a story - it’s a cultural event.

A live reckoning that turns every viewer into a participant, every opinion into a choice.

For some, the verdict will feel like justice.
For others, betrayal.

But for everyone, it will be unforgettable.

And when the case closes, the debate doesn’t.

The conversation around the verdict continues long after the season ends - until a new case, new characters, new evidence, and new uncertainty take their place in Season Two of The Jury.

“It didn’t feel like a show. It felt like being trusted with something real.”

“It didn’t feel like a show. It felt like being trusted with something real.”

Juror Season One

The Format & Future

The Format & Future

The Format & Future

A globally scalable franchise, adaptable to any country or legal system.

Different regions can create their own versions - The Jury: Australia, The Jury: UK, The Jury: France - each reflecting the legal, cultural, and social tensions of their world.

Each season introduces a new case, new characters, and a new moral fault line for the audience to cross. From the corridors of academia to small-town courthouses and corporate boardrooms, every version asks a different question about truth, justice, and the stories we choose to believe.

Across every format, the same structure holds: a serialized drama leading to a public deliberation, a verdict decided by the audience, and a finale shaped by the collective will of millions.

In time, The Jury becomes more than a series - it becomes an event that renews itself with every new case.

A global franchise that transforms television into story that spills beyond the screen and into your life.

The Team

The Team

The Team

Pete Breton
Writer and creative director. The Jury continues his pursuit of stories that move people - and redefine how audiences connect with them.

email: petebreton@me.com

cell: (416) 833 3234


Michelle Archer
Writer, producer, and award-winning marketer. Co-created a national TV special featuring Seth Rogen and Maitreyi Ramakrishnan (Canadian Screen Award–nominated) and brings 25 years of storytelling and brand experience to The Jury.

email: michelle@archerandco.co

cell: (416) 627 1817

Pete Breton
Writer and creative director. The Jury continues his pursuit of stories that move people - and redefine how audiences connect with them.

email: petebreton@me.com

cell: (416) 833 3234


Michelle Archer
Writer, producer, and award-winning marketer. Co-created a national TV special featuring Seth Rogen and Maitreyi Ramakrishnan (Canadian Screen Award–nominated) and brings 25 years of storytelling and brand experience to The Jury.

email: michelle@archerandco.co

cell: (416) 627 1817